St Andrew’s Day 2021: how a fisherman became Scotland’s patron saint

there is a little boozer atop a hill in London called the house of Commons which on Tuesday was once hit by an uncongenial snowstorm. A handful of MPs had been locked in; masses had been locked out.

It wasn’t a problem, however, since the anti-Covid measures they planned to speak about – masks, self-isolation and so forth – had already taken impact in advance that day (at 4am). Left to litigate a very misplaced cause were one Labour backbencher, one Lib Dem (which, to be truthful, is what they consider a quorum), a Scottish Nat, who wasn’t going to vote on the matter however can be heard on it however, and a dozen Tory punters satisfied to spend a couple of hours stranded away from the trouble and strife, arguing the toss over their favourite matter.

Pull a barstool; pour us a pint. Let’s communicate freedom!

“I Am keen on liberty,” mentioned Daisy Cooper (Lib Dem), nevertheless it will have to forestall when we unfold disease and harm other folks. That Is lacking the purpose, countered Steve Baker (Con): one may decide to put on a mask to protect others, however the moment an individual is *pressured* to do the proper factor, freedom is going out the window. Dignity, too. we are facing “a basic choice among heaven and heading towards hell,” declared Mr Baker, who most popular to be at the “path to heaven”. That stated, if Heaven turns out to be non-smoking, i think a few Tories will illuminate a cigar and blow smoke in angels’ faces.

“Why don’t contributors at the executive benches wear face coverings?” demanded an MP. “Because we’re not on a bus!” came the fruity answer.

Placeholder image for youtube video: mTljrhTFlJc

the issue with masks, joked Sir Christopher Chope “is that very few folks do put on them accurately. The World Well Being Organization writes that as quickly as you take off your facemask, you want to wash your hands and you wish to discard your facemask after which wash your arms again!”

Clive Betts (Lab) instructed the house that miscreants who do not wear a mask, while requested why, simply make up an exemption my friend Herbert always says “athletes foot”, and demanded to grasp what could be performed to establish the truth – reflecting the inquisitional tone that so unsettled Steve Brine (Con). Under the phrases of this legislation, mentioned Mr Brine, one might be compelled to move into isolation after entering touch with a “suspected” case of the omicron variant, no matter what that means.

“There’s a component of Salem witch trials about this,” he mentioned, the talk turning hyperbolic as the hours ticked by. If this have been Massachusetts in 1692, in fact, Labour can be calling for preventative measures against cackling hags and the Tory backbenches may insist that being became a frog is a matter of private choice.

At 3.45pm, the snow lifted lengthy sufficient for masses of MPs to trek bravely into the chamber and vote: masks handed 434-24, isolation by means of 431-36. The caucus for freedom proved small.

Then, as the solar fell and the wind picked up once more, such a lot of our wise MPs, deferring to the precautionary idea, evacuated the status quo and toddled off house.

Leave a Comment